my 1st amendment rights

The First Amendment also affords us with another freedom: “The right of the people peaceably to assemble.” And Americans are living it now more. On Saturday, abortion rights advocates met at the intersection of Seventh Street and Range Line Road in Joplin to exercise several of their. Although the First Amendment limits government censorship, it does not limit most private action. Restrictions on your speech are far more.

You can watch a thematic video

Clueless Deputy In Georgia - Thinks He is The Law - 1st Amendment Audit

My 1st amendment rights -


  • But since those rosy scenarios were first floated, the California political scene has grown more crowded.

    The Golden State Preps for the ‘Red Wedding’ of Senate Races DAILY BEAST

  • Eric Garcetti succeeded Villaraigosa and has received high marks in his first year and a half on the job.

    The Golden State Preps for the ‘Red Wedding’ of Senate Races

    First Amendment Rights

    Freedom of Religion

    The right of each and every American to practice his or her own religion, or no religion at all, is among the most fundamental of the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. The Constitution’s framers understood very well that religious liberty can flourish only if the government leaves religion alone.

    The free exercise clause of the First Amendment guarantees the right to practice one’s religion free of government interference. That includes government both using its power to advance particular religious beliefs or practices, as well as using its power to put unconstitutional limitations on the free exercise of religion.

    The ACLU of Alabama works to ensure that religious liberty is protected by keeping government policies from advancing specific religious beliefs and by keeping the government out of the business of religion.

    Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech, the press, association, assembly, and petition: This set of guarantees, protected by the First Amendment, comprises what we refer to as freedom of expression. It is the foundation of a vibrant democracy, and without it, other fundamental rights, like the right to vote, would wither away.

    The fight for freedom of speech has been a bedrock of the ACLU’s mission since the organization was founded in 1920, driven by the need to protect the constitutional rights of conscientious objectors and anti-war protesters. The organization’s work quickly spread to combating censorship, securing the right to assembly, and promoting free speech in schools.

    Almost a century later, these battles have taken on new forms, but they persist. The ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project continues to champion freedom of expression in its myriad forms — whether through protest, media, online speech, or the arts — in the face of new threats. For example, new avenues for censorship have arisen alongside the wealth of opportunities for speech afforded by the Internet. The threat of mass government surveillance chills the free expression of ordinary citizens, legislators routinely attempt to place new restrictions on online activity, and journalism is criminalized in the name of national security. The ACLU is always on guard to ensure that the First Amendment’s protections remain robust — in times of war or peace, for bloggers or the institutional press, online or off.

    Over the years, the ACLU has frequently represented or defended individuals engaged in some truly offensive speech. We have defended the speech rights of communists, Nazis, Ku Klux Klan members, accused terrorists, pornographers, anti-LGBT activists, and flag burners. That’s because the defense of freedom of speech is most necessary when the message is one most people find repulsive. Constitutional rights must apply to even the most unpopular groups if they’re going to be preserved for everyone.

    David Freedlander Horace Greeley

  • Now first we shall want our pupil to understand, speak, read and write the mother tongue well.

    The Salvaging Of Civilisation David Freedlander

    protester with megaphone

    In light of recent and upcoming events, I have received lots of questions about the First Amendment from family, friends, and clients.  It is a great opportunity to have a quick brush up on one of rights that make the United States of America the United States of America!


    The First Amendment provides many protections, but the extent of those protections are often misunderstood.

     The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

    The First Amendment prohibits Congress from making any laws that establish a national religion, or impinge on the free exercise of religion, the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or from prohibiting citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.


    The Supreme Court interprets to what extent the First Amendment affords protection to these rights.  While explicitly only naming Congress, the First Amendment has been interpreted to apply to all of the federal government and by extension of the Fourteenth Amendment, to state governments.


    Again, the First Amendment protects the right to peaceful assembly and protest but, the key word in that statement is ‘peaceful.’ First Amendment protections do not extend to rioting and acts of violence.


    The First Amendment prohibits the federal and state government from infringing on those protected rights.  Those prohibitions and protections do not extend to a privately owned company such as Facebook or Target.  For example, one cannot walk into a Target and curse, claiming freedom under the First Amendment.  Because Target is privately owned, Target has the right to establish its own rules including the right not to serve or sell to someone who violates those rules.

    Contrast this with exercising that same speech at an organized government protest.  The government cannot stop you from saying that same curse word or remove you from a protest for doing so.

    For further example, if you violate the terms of a company’s social media rules and are removed from their platform, that company has not violated your First Amendment rights. It is within its rights to establish its own rules of use.  Contrast that with if the government tried to remove a person from social media or delete a social media post because of the contents of a post.  That intrusion by the government, would be a violation of the First Amendment.

    Another misconception is that if a company is publicly traded on the stock market, it is a public company.  It simply means that it must comply with federal and state rules to open types of investing into its company, it does not change the fact the company is privately owned.  For example, a person who owns a bar does not become an extension of the state government by applying for a liquor license.


     Yes, federal and state governments have enacted many laws deeming several types of discrimination illegal, such as discrimination based on race or gender.  However, those protections have not been extended to the limitation of political speech on one side or the other.


    It goes back to the advice I give my children, while one may have the right to say (or nowadays, post on social media) whatever one wants, that does not mean there will not be consequences to that action later.

    Those consequences can include removal from a private business, social media, or employment actions.  Just be aware that nothing can be deleted anymore.

    As an aside, pets and kids, and pictures of them, are almost always free from criticism.

    David Freedlander

    The Free Speech Center

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or national city credit card online payment the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” – The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

    1. The five freedoms it protects: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. Together, these five guaranteed freedoms make the people of the United States of America the freest in the world.
    2. Before agreeing to accept the Constitution, the Founders of our democratic republic demanded that these freedoms be protected by an amendment to the original document – the First Amendment.
    3. There’s no “legal age” you have to reach to exercise your First Amendment freedoms. They are guaranteed to you the day you’re born. There’s also no citizenship requirement for First Amendment protection. If you’re in the U.S., you have freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition.
    4. The First Amendment is neither “left-wing” or “right-wing.” It can be used to push for social and political change, or to oppose change. The First Amendment is for everyone.
    5. The First Amendment protects us against government limits on our freedom of expression, but it doesn’t prevent a private employer from setting its own rules.
    6. The First Amendment prevents government from requiring you to say something you don't want to, or keeping you from hearing or reading the words of others (even if you never speak out yourself, you have the right to receive information).
    7. Students have the right to pray in America’s public schools, as long as there’s no disruption to school operations and no government employees (teachers, coaches) are involved.

    Looking for a general overview? Here it is, from the First Amendment Encyclopedia.



    What does the First Amendment say about freedom of speech? Can amazon prime movies to watch be restricted, and if so, when? In this overview, a First Amendment scholar explains what sorts of speech are protected, where free expression may be limited, and why “[f]reedom of speech is a core American belief, almost a kind of secular religious tenet, hacienda san jose caguas zip code article of constitutional faith.”


    How did freedom of the press come about? Are there restrictions on press my 1st amendment rights The ways in which this core freedom has developed in law are explained in this overview by a First Amendment scholar. In quotations from one court ruling, “‘[F]reedom of expression upon public questions is secured by the First Amendment’” so that “‘debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide-open.’”


    The First Amendment introduced bold new ideas to the world: that government must not impose a state religion on the public, or place undue restrictions on religious practice, but must recognize the right of the people to believe and worship, or not, as their conscience dictates. This First Amendment scholar’s overview makes clear the many aspects of our religious freedom, saying, “That bold constitutional experiment in granting religious freedom to all remains in place, and in progress, in the United States.”


    Our right to gather in peaceful public protest – in marches, rallies and other assemblies – is another core freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment. As a First Amendment scholar says in this overview, “First Amendment freedoms ring hollow if government officials can repress expression that they fear will create a disturbance or offend. Unless there is real danger of imminent harm, assembly rights must be respected.”


    This least-known First Amendment freedom is nevertheless crucial to our democratic republic’s form of government. “Petition is the right to ask government at any level to right a wrong or correct a problem,” writes a First Amendment scholar in this overview detailing how the right of petition works in our government, and the forms it takes.

    First Amendment Encyclopedia

    A comprehensive research compilation covering all aspects of First Amendment law.

    First Amendment Center Archives

    Archival site of the Newseum Institute’s First Amendment Center, containing news and commentary on First Amendment issues through 2012.

    First Amendment Timeline

    Significant historical events, court cases and ideas that have shaped our current system of constitutional First Gelena solano edad jurisprudence, compiled by the Newseum Institute’s First Amendment Center.


    If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

    is coconut milk saturated fat bad for you fifth third bank cincinnati ohio phone number If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains * and * are unblocked.

    Current time:0:00Total duration:16:14

    Video transcript

    - [Kim] Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy, and today I'm learning more about the First Amendment my 1st amendment rights the US Constitution. The First Amendment is one of the most important amendments to the Constitution, if not the most important. It reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting "an my 1st amendment rights of religion, or prohibiting the free "exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, "or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably "to assemble, and to petition the Government "for a redress of grievances." To learn more about the First Amendment, I talked to two experts. Erwin Chemerinsky is the Jesse H. Choper distinguished professor of law and dean of Berkeley Law. Michael McConnell is the Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. Professor Chemerinsky, there is a lot going on in the First Amendment. Can you tell us a little bit more about why the framers chose to protect these rights in particular? - [Erwin] The historical background of the First Amendment of the Constitution shows why the framers wanted to be sure that all of the liberties in the First Amendment were safeguarded. Let's focus on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. In England, there was, after the printing press developed, licensing so that anyone who wanted to be able to publish anything needed to have a license from the government. As such, licensing was seen to be inconsistent with freedom of speech, freedom of the press; for that matter, freedom of thought, freedom of inquiry. - [Kim] Interesting, okay, so there are a lot of essential freedoms that are packed into this First Amendment, so much that it's almost amazing that we're gonna attempt to talk about them all in one video. But if we dial in to freedom of speech, Professor McConell, what is freedom of speech? Does that encompass some things and not others? - [Michael] Well freedom of speech was actually less important to the framers than the freedom with which it was coupled, which was the freedom of the press. The reason for this is that speech that can reach large audiences is much more important to the individual but also dangerous to the state, than mere speech. When you speak, only those people within hearing range can hear you, but when you are able to use Gutenberg's fantastic new technology to publish your sentiments and distribute them widely, maybe even over the entire country or across the Atlantic, reaching hundreds of thousands of people. Now that is powerful. You think about how the American Revolution was won. This required spreading the word, it required gaining converts and telling people what their grievances were. To a very great extent this was done through the mechanism of the printing press. - [Erwin] When you ask the question, "What's freedom of speech?" there's implicit within it the issue of, 'What do we mean by speech?' Ultimately, the answer to your question is that the First Amendment, in protecting speech, broadly safeguards a right to express one's ideas. But it's not absolute. The government can restrict expression if there's a compelling interest. - [Kim] Interesting, can you say more about that? - [Erwin] The Supreme Court always has been clear that freedom of speech is not absolute. The Court has said that there are certain categories of speech that are unprotected by the First Amendment. Incitement and illegal activity is a category of unprotected speech. The Court has said this requires showing that the speech was directed at causing imminent illegal activity, and there is a substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity. Another example: obscenity is unprotected by the First Amendment. The Court struggled for years with trying to define, 'What is obscenity?' Maybe the low point in that is when Justice Potter Stewart said, "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it." There are also these categories of speech where the government can prohibit, even punish the expression. - [Michael] That's where most of the limitations on the freedom speech and of the press come from, is in order to make sure that we don't hurt other people's rights through the use our own. An example of that, the government can prohibit speech which incites violence against someone. So if you're making a speech and calling upon the crowd to attack somebody's house or their person, that can be punished and prevented as an incitement to violence. You can see how that follows from the logical idea of freedom of speech being a natural right, and therefore limited by the rights of other people. - [Kim] So let's turn our attention toward the freedom of religion part of the First Amendment. So the first thing that the Amendment says is about establishment. What does the Establishment Clause prevent? - [Erwin] The language of the First Amendment is important, it says that Congress may make no law respecting the establishment of religion. Since 1947 the Supreme Court has said that that also applies to state and local governments. The Supreme Court has said this means that the government cannot act with the purpose of advancing religion. - [Michael] To the founders, this was a very clear legal concept, namely it was the established Church of England that in the statute books, in the law, the Church of England was referred to as, and I quote, "The Church by law established." What did it mean to be established? First of all, it meant that the doctrines of the Church, the 39 Articles of Faith of the Church of England, were voted upon by parliament. So the doctrines, the liturgy, the text, were all adopted by law. The established Church was the government's church, and it could be wells fargo bank routing number in nj, and from time to time was used, as a instrument of government or as an instrument of politics. This is a way in which the government is able to have a powerful influence on the way in which values and opinions are inculcated. It's one of the most important ideas of the established church, especially in the 18th century, was to teach that there's actually a religious obligation to obey the law and to recognize the king as the supreme leader in matters of both church and state. The framer's experience with this was extremely powerful. - [Erwin] That's because the framers were aware of the religious persecution that had gone on in other countries. They were aware of the evils that occur when the government becomes aligned with a particular religion. - [Michael] The principal reason why many of the colonists had come to these shores to begin with was to escape the oppressions of the established Church of England back home, and to come to a place where they would be able to exercise the freedom of religion for themselves. The main opponents of the established church were not anti-Christian or anti-religious people. They were the most religious people, and their view was the government should stay our of our church, that we will decide what we believe for ourselves, we will control our own church, we will write our own liturgy, we will decide what version of the Bible we're going to use, we'll choose our own ministers. Thank you very much government, stay out of it. Leave us free to practice our religion without having this kind of an establishment. - [Erwin] For instance, a county in Kentucky required that the Ten Commandments be posted in all county buildings. The Supreme Court said, "The Ten Commandments "are religious scripture. "There's no secular purpose for having the Ten Commandments "posted in county buildings." The Court declared it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has said, "The government can't act "where there primary effect "is to advance or to inhibit religion." For example, there can't be prayer in public schools. Even voluntary prayer my 1st amendment rights public schools in impermissible, because the Court has said that the primary effect of having prayer in public schools is to advance religion. The Court has explained that children will inevitably feel pressure to participate, and this coercion violates the Constitution. - [Kim] So, the First Amendment then prevents that kind of intermingling of the government and the church. This is I guess the key idea of separation between church and state, but it also says that the Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. So what does that mean? - [Michael] Free exercise of religion was the right to practice your own religion. It didn't keep the government from setting up a church, but it did keep the government from requiring you to attend that church, maybe even to contribute to the church, but also kept the government from preventing you from worshiping elsewhere. So the Establishment Clause by and large prevents the government from forcing people to participate in religion, and the Free Exercise Clause by and large prohibits the government from preventing people from practicing their religion. Those two things work together to enable everyone to worship God in accordance with their own conscience. - [Kim] Interesting. So you mentioned a little bit about freedom of the press, but there are two other aspects of the First Amendment: the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and my 1st amendment rights petition the government of a redress of grievances. So what is included with the right to peaceably assemble? Are there any situations where that might be restricted? - [Erwin] The Supreme Court has said that under freedom of speech, there's a right to use government property for speech purposes. This is also something that tells the freedom of assembly. The Supreme Court has said there's certain government properties that the government is required to make available for speech: sidewalks and parks. There's other places where the government has more latitude to regulating speech: school facilities, evenings and weekends. There's places where the government can close entirely to speech: military bases, areas outside prisons and jails. All of these cases could have been litigated under freedom of assembly. Some of the earlier cases explicitly mentioned freedom of assembly, but subsequent cases combined freedom of assembly into the protection of freedom of speech. - [Kim] I guess that makes sense, But what about something like a march, for example, that might, say, block traffic. That's perhaps a clear case when there is this tension between freedom of speech and assembly and say, public indiana unemployment debit card phone number, if they're blocking, say, an ambulance. How do you resolve that tension? - [Michael] Sometime in roughly the 1970s, the Court began using a quite different way of looking at the free speech question, in which they said that laws which regulate or prohibit speech on the basis of the content of the speech are, generally speaking, unconstitutional, absent a very important governmental purpose. But the laws that are content neutral, and regulate speech from a basis of it's time, place, or manner are permitted. So the basic idea here is the government has regulatory authority over speech, but not over what you say. Just over when you say it, where you say it, how you say it. - [Kim] So, the last thing in the First Amendment is the phrase "petitioning the government "for a redress of grievances." Congress shall make no law abridging that freedom. What does this mean? How would one petition the first financial bank stephenville tx routing number for a redress of grievances? - [Erwin] There are of course many ways that people can petition government for redress of grievances. It's the ability to go and testify before our legislative body. It's the ability to communicate with one's leglislators or representatives about change. It's basically the ability to go to the government and ask it to change its policy. There are relatively few cases just about the right to petition government for redress of grievances. Again, I think the reason for that is, it's been so subsumed into the protection my 1st amendment rights freedom of speech. Everything one would do by way of petitioning government for redress of grievances is through speech and expression, and so the larger protection of speech and expression has meant that the Court hasn't needed to focus so much on this particular right. - [Kim] Is there anything that you feel people commonly misunderstand about the First Amendment, what it encompasses and what it does not? - [Erwin] One of the most important misunderstandings about this First Amendment, is that people fail to realize that it, like all rights in the Constitution, apply only to the government. Before I took my current job, I was a professor at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. Duke is a private university. If while I was there, I had criticized the president of the university, and he would have ordered me fired, I could not have sued him or Duke University my 1st amendment rights violating my free speech rights. The First Amendment doesn't apply because it's a private university. Now I'm at the University of California, a state university. If I were to give a speech criticizing the president my 1st amendment rights the university, or the chancellor of my campus, and I was to be fired for doing that, I could sue. I would sue, because this is a public university. The First Amendment applies. - [Michael] So I think the really dangerous thing in our times is that many people believe that they have some kind of a right not to hear opinions that they find offensive. Certainly college campuses are filled with controversies of this sort. This is something that our Constitution bim 360 login online designed to prevent. Free speech can inflict offense. Sometimes it can be hurtful and insulting, but we as a nation have decided that it is better to put up with that so that we can all be free to express ourselves, to criticize the government, to urge the religious and scientific and artistic ideas that we have. It's more important for all of us to do that than it is to be able to retreat to safe spaces and require other people to shut up. - [Kim] So we've learned that the rights protected in the First Amendment derive from the historical context of restricted speech, press, and religion in Europe that the framers wished to avoid in the United States. Freedom of religion includes both the freedom not to participate in religion, and the freedom to practice whatever religion you choose. Freedom of speech extends to all forms of freedom of expression, not just words, but there are limits to what counts as free speech. To learn more about the First Amendment, visit the National Constitution Center's interactive Constitution, and Khan Academy's resources on US government and politics.
    January 9, 2015 MIT Technology Review

  • This is not about First Amendment rights, which some claim, rather the actions of their graduates trying to overturn a basic tenet of our democracy, the right to vote and have your vote counted.

    Harvard, Stanford, Yale: Denounce sedition of your graduates

    Notice: Undefined variable: z_bot in /sites/ on line 136

    Notice: Undefined variable: z_empty in /sites/ on line 136

  • 3 Replies to “My 1st amendment rights”

    1. U r right but our parents didn't agree for correspondence course and also we may get frustrated by staying at one place not meeting other people and just only studying for the exams for 3 years. I know people who clear ibps PO in 1st attempt after graduation and bro correspondence course also require same amount of money as the regular course (graduation) so how u can say that 3 years money get wasted 🙆‍♂️for IBPS PO or SBI PO the eligibility is graduation must be completed in any field from a recognized University/institute so anyhow we have to complete our graduation otherwise we are not eligible and we must chose a course for a backup plan who knows we will get a government job when n where .sometimes life also changes and we have to depend on ourselves for money

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *